The information presented in the summary of findings table below comes from a living network meta-analysis that combines all the available evidence on prophylactic interventions for COVID-19. This statistical approach allows us to obtain estimates of effect for all potential comparisons, even those that have not been compared head-to-head in trials. We present the most trustworthy estimates of effect, based on the GRADE approach.
Summary of Findings Table
Population: People at risk of COVID-19
Abbreviations: AE, adverse events; 95% CI, 95% credible interval; NMA, network meta-analysis; N/A, not applicable; RCT, randomized control trial; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus 2
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.